Our assessment
One flat program figure, no plan term, and a membership fee stated as none in a table row rather than in a slogan. That part is clean. The same table then quotes what its competitors charge, in two bands, as though those were measurements. They are Oak's own characterization of companies it never names, and there are sellers here priced well below both bands.
The rest of that table is about other companies
The other two columns give a monthly cost band for brand-name medications and another for other telehealth companies, plus a membership-fee band for those companies. No company is named and no source is given.
Treat those bands as advertising. Several sellers in this comparison sit well below the range Oak attributes to its rivals.
Licensed, but never named
Oak answers the pharmacy question with a category rather than a name: every prescription is reviewed by a board-certified provider and fulfilled through licensed US compounding pharmacies that comply with state and federal pharmacy regulations.
That sentence is doing real work — it tells you a person reviews the order and that the dispenser is licensed — and it stops exactly where a reader would want it to continue. No pharmacy is named, no provider is named, and no state list appears anywhere on the page.
Shipping is free with tracking. The page states no cancellation or refund terms at all, which is a different thing from stating a narrow one.
Four companies, and you can't tell which one you're buying from
The terms of use name an operating company fifty-one times. The privacy policy names two holding companies. A third holding company appears alongside them. Nothing on the site reconciles the four, and nothing says which entity you would actually be contracting with.
The program figure isn't tied to a drug either. The page names compounded semaglutide in its own copy and tirzepatide elsewhere, and the price sits against the phrase weight loss programs. No compounding pharmacy, no individual clinician and no service area is published.
Oak's published pricing
Prices re-verified September 2026
| Medication | Price |
|---|---|
| MedicationGlp-1 (compounded) — not stated | Price$190/moThe seller's comparison table and FAQ both give $190 a month as the program price. It isn't tied to a specific drug, though the page names both compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide. |
Compare GLP may earn a commission when a reader signs up with a provider through a link on this site. 28 of the 420 providers reviewed here are paid partners today; the other 392 are not. See how this works.
See Oak's current price →Who Oak suits
Good fit if
- Readers who want one recurring figure with no term and no membership attached.
- Buyers who want the fee position stated as a value in a table rather than as a claim.
- People who want to see how a seller describes its own competitors when it writes the comparison.
Look elsewhere if
- Anyone who would take the competitor bands in its table as market data.
- Readers who need to know which drug the figure buys.
- Buyers who want to know which of four named entities they are contracting with.
- People who need a named pharmacy, a named clinician or a service-area list.
What stands out about Oak
Strengths
- States its fee position as none in a table rather than in a slogan, and prints shipping as free in the same row
- Publishes one figure with no plan term attached, so what is quoted is what recurs
- Names three related holding companies and its own operating LLC across its privacy policy and terms
- No FDA warning letter identified for this company in our September 2026 search
Trade-offs
- Its comparison table states rivals' prices — "$400-$500/mo" for other telehealth and "$50-$99/mo" in membership fees — as if they were measurements. They are the seller's own characterization, and this comparison holds figures well below both bands
- The $190 figure is not scoped to a drug, so which molecule it buys is not established
- Names four different corporate entities across its pages, three of them holding companies, and reconciles none of them
- Names no compounding pharmacy, no individual prescribing clinician and no service area
How this review was verified
- The weight-loss page, the privacy policy and the terms of use were read.
- Four corporate names appear across the legal pages, one of them fifty-one times. Tracker disclosures naming three large technology companies are not among them.
- The competitor figures in Oak's comparison table are its own characterization of unnamed rivals, with no source given.
- The program figure is not scoped to a molecule on the priced page.
- No FDA warning letter under either name.
Where Oak ranks
Oak qualifies for 1 of the 6 boards on this site. A board only ranks the providers that meet its own condition, so a missing board means Oak does not publish what that board sorts on.
- Cheapest Overall — #18 of 396
Compare Oak directly
Compare GLP may earn a commission when a reader signs up with a provider through a link on this site. 28 of the 420 providers reviewed here are paid partners today; the other 392 are not. See how this works.
| Provider | Score | From/mo | Full review | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belle Health | 10.0/10 | From/mo$109Advertised monthly equivalent for a twelve-month supply; not a verified monthly installment. Six-month rate $119, two-month rate $135, one-month rate $199. Confirm the upfront payment and refill schedule. | Full reviewRead the Belle Health review | Visit |
| Midi Health | 10.0/10 | From/mo$164for a 4-week supply, the lowest of four published dose tiers, including shipping | Full reviewRead the Midi Health review | Visit |
| altRx | 8.6/10 | From/mo$89/moadvertised monthly starting price for a multi-dose vial; confirm plan length and checkout total | Full reviewRead the altRx review | Visit |
Frequently asked questions
Is the price a promotional or a prepaid rate?
Neither, as far as the page shows. No plan term, prepayment condition or introductory qualifier appears beside it.
Is there a membership fee?
No. Its own comparison table gives its membership fees as none and its shipping as free.
Are the competitor prices in its table accurate?
They are Oak's own characterization of unnamed rivals, with no source. There are sellers in this comparison well below both bands it quotes.
Which company is it?
Four corporate names appear across its legal pages, an operating company and three holding companies, and nothing reconciles them.
Does it have an FDA warning letter?
No letter was found. Two of its named entities were checked against FDA's public record. Untitled letters are published separately and were not searched.
Ready to compare directly?
Oak scores 4.3/10 on this site's rubric. Review the published prices and their conditions above, then confirm your total with the provider. Visiting its site does not commit you to treatment.
Compare GLP may earn a commission when a reader signs up with a provider through a link on this site. 28 of the 420 providers reviewed here are paid partners today; the other 392 are not. See how this works.
Visit Oak →