One character of footnote, carrying the whole claim
The headline runs across the page twice, with a small asterisk on the figure and, immediately below, the condition: a twelve-month package. The seller is not hiding it. It is simply very small, and it changes what the number means completely.
A twelve-month package rate is not the price of a month. It is a year bought at once, expressed per month, and comparing it with a month-to-month figure from another seller compares two different purchases.
The figure belongs to no drug
Semaglutide appears once on the page. Tirzepatide appears once. Neither is priced. The advertised figure sits against the phrase personalised GLP-1 treatments, so which molecule a buyer gets for it, and at what dose, is not established anywhere.
We have stored it against the general GLP-1 category for that reason, with the twelve-month condition written into the qualifier so that no page here can print the number without it.
Everything else it sells, priced the same way
The homepage prices several other lanes on the same screen, most of them with the same asterisk. That consistency is useful context: this is how the seller prices, not a trick played on the GLP-1 lane alone.
No operating company appears on any page we read. Its published pricing policy says only that it offers transparent pricing with no hidden fees, which does not answer whether a membership applies. Its own pricing path returns a 404.
BluefitMD's published pricing
| Medication | Price | Verified |
|---|---|---|
| Glp-1 (compounded) | $75/mo⛔ "As low as $75/mo*" where the asterisk on the same line reads "*With a 12-month package". Printed without that condition it would sit near the top of a cheapest table on a term nobody else in it is on — five sellers here publish a lower monthly medication figure, and all five bill it monthly. The page names semaglutide and tirzepatide once each and never scopes the figure to either | September 2026source |
compareglp may earn a commission when a reader signs up with a provider through a link on this site. 4 of the 198 providers reviewed here are paid partners today; the other 194 are not. See how this works.
See BluefitMD's current price →Good fit if
- Readers who intend to commit to a full year and want to see what that commitment buys.
- Buyers comparing several wellness lanes from one seller on one screen.
- Anyone who wants a worked example of how much of a low headline figure survives its own footnote.
Look elsewhere if
- Readers buying month to month; the advertised figure is not available to them.
- Anyone who needs to know which drug the price buys.
- Buyers who want a named company, pharmacy or clinician, or a service-area list.
- Readers for whom an FDA warning letter is disqualifying.
How this review was verified
- Re-read the priced homepage, the about page and the policies page on 7 September 2026, comparing requested to effective URLs and running a nonsense path against the host in the same run, which returned a 404.
- Read the asterisk and its footnote as part of the figure, and wrote the twelve-month condition into the stored qualifier so it cannot be separated from the number.
- Counted the molecule names on the priced page rather than assuming the figure applied to a drug it does not name.
- Ran a widened corporate-suffix pattern across every cached body on the host, proved first against a page known to name a company; it returned nothing here.
- Screened the brand against FDA's live warning-letter datatable with a positive and a negative control in the same invocation, and re-fetched the letter to confirm its title matches the name, reference number and date.