Per vial, and no month anywhere
The weight-loss page asks the cost question in its own heading and answers it directly: a figure for semaglutide per vial, a figure for tirzepatide per vial. No dose, no volume, no fill interval and no month appear beside either.
That is not evasive so much as incomplete. A reader knows what one purchase costs and cannot work out what a year costs. We have stored both as non-monthly figures so that nothing on this site can attach a per-month suffix to them.
The injection is priced separately
A separate sentence gives a fee for having the injection administered by a registered nurse or nurse practitioner at the clinic, rather than self-injecting. It is a small charge and it is a real one, and pricing it separately is more honest than folding it into a headline.
It is also a reminder that this is a physical clinic rather than a national platform. The page names its own offices, which sets the geography without a state list.
A host that answers a missing page with nothing
The nonsense path we ran against this host returned a 404 carrying no visible text at all. That is honest about the status code but it means an absence measured here — no company named, no pharmacy named — rests on pages that render thinly to a fetcher.
We looked and found no operating company on any page read, and we are recording that as a weak finding rather than a firm one. The name FDA addressed its letter to is a trading name that does not appear on the site.
Erasing Age's published pricing
| Medication | Price | Verified |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide (compounded) | $425⛔ per vial. No month, week or fill interval is stated anywhere on the page, so this figure cannot be compared with a monthly rate | September 2026source |
| Tirzepatide (compounded) | $725⛔ per vial, with no period stated | September 2026source |
| Glp-1 (compounded) | $33a fee, not a drug price: charged per injection when a patient has an RN or NP administer it rather than self-injecting | September 2026source |
compareglp may earn a commission when a reader signs up with a provider through a link on this site. 4 of the 198 providers reviewed here are paid partners today; the other 194 are not. See how this works.
See Erasing Age's current price →Good fit if
- Readers in the Dallas-Fort Worth area who want an in-person injection option priced separately.
- Buyers who want a direct answer to the cost question on the page they land on.
- People comparing a per-purchase price against the subscription model most of this market uses.
Look elsewhere if
- Anyone who needs a monthly figure or an annual total; neither can be derived from what is published.
- Readers who need to know which company they are contracting with.
- Buyers outside the clinic's own region who want a service-area list.
- Readers for whom an FDA warning letter is disqualifying.
How this review was verified
- Re-read the priced weight-loss page and the about pages on 7 September 2026, comparing requested to effective URLs and running a nonsense path against the host in the same run.
- Recorded the control's behaviour — a 404 with no visible text — and downgraded every absence claim on this host accordingly, rather than reporting a thin render as a finding.
- Stored both drug figures as non-monthly, and stored the administration fee as a fee that does not buy medication.
- Ran a widened corporate-suffix pattern across every cached body on the host, proved first against a page known to name a company; it returned nothing here.
- Screened the name FDA addressed and the brand against the live warning-letter datatable with a positive and a negative control in the same invocation, and re-fetched the letter to confirm its title matches the name, reference number and date.