A visit fee, and the seller says so
The published figure buys a consultation with a clinician who may write a prescription. The medication is then filled at a pharmacy of the buyer's choosing, and the page states outright that medication costs vary with the drug prescribed and the pharmacy chosen.
Six of the seventy-three sellers here publish a figure that is not the medication. On this roster those rows carry a flag so that no tool adds a care fee to a drug price or reads one as the other.
The seller's own two pages give the fee two different period words, one per visit and the other per consultation. They plainly describe the same charge, and both are recorded, because a comparison built on the difference between a visit and a consultation would be built on a distinction the seller has not drawn.
Two further charges live in the terms rather than beside the price: a fee for cancelling within an hour, and the same for not attending. Neither appears on either priced page.
The widest product list here
The weight-loss page prints a product grid rather than marketing copy: brand injectables, a brand tablet, compounded versions of both main compounds, and two liraglutide entries. That covers three molecules and both formulations, and forty-one of the seventy-three sellers here offer a brand route of any kind.
Naming products is not the same as pricing them, and none of these carries a figure. What the grid does is tell a reader what a clinician here can write, which is the question a visit fee actually answers.
The company also runs several unrelated service lines at their own separate fees. Any figure found elsewhere on this site belongs to one of those lines, so scope anything you read here to the weight-loss lane before comparing it.
No membership, stated three times
Twenty-eight of the seventy-three sellers here state that no membership applies. This one says it three separate times across two priced surfaces, including on the price card itself.
A stated absence is worth more than silence, and this roster records a membership as absent only when a seller says so rather than merely omits it. Twenty of the seventy-three say nothing either way.
The commercial shape is therefore about as simple as this comparison gets: one charge, per visit, with the drug bought elsewhere. What it costs to actually treat a condition is a question this page does not answer and does not pretend to.
The fifty-one-state page is for a different service
This site publishes a page listing every state and the District of Columbia in a table headed with states and services. It looks exactly like a coverage list. Its own structured data names it a treatment availability directory with fifty-one entries — and every one of those entries links to an addiction-treatment page.
It is not a weight-loss footprint. The only footprint statement for this service line anywhere on the site is a four-word exclusion printed under the price card, and its abbreviation is ambiguous on its face between a state and a city. The seller does not disambiguate it.
Forty-one of the seventy-three sellers here publish no service area, and this row is one of them, with that sentence quoted. The terms add a general warning that the platform may not be available in your state. Read where a link goes, not what a row says, is the lesson this page teaches better than any other in the comparison.
No governing law, and a venue that only applies if arbitration fails
A census of the full terms found no choice-of-law clause. What exists instead is a conditional venue: if the arbitration provision is found unenforceable, jurisdiction sits with the courts of one county in one state — a state that is not the one the company gives as its own address.
That clause is recorded verbatim on this row rather than resolved to a state name, because resolving it would assert a governing law the document does not state. Several sellers on this roster publish no governing-law state, so this is a normal condition of the market rather than an anomaly.
The company does name itself and a notice address, and it states its own structure: it is not a medical practice, and care is delivered by a medical group with its own privacy notice. Thirty-three of the seventy-three sellers here name no individual prescribing clinician, and this is one of them. Fifty-three name no pharmacy, and this is one of those too — the prescription goes wherever the buyer sends it.
QuickMD's published pricing
| Medication | Price | Verified |
|---|---|---|
| Glp-1 (brand) | $99A flat consultation fee, given two different period words on the seller's own two pages: "Weight loss treatment through QuickMD is $99 per visit" on the weight-loss page, and "Weight loss consultation — $99 /consultation" on the pricing page. ⚠ It does not buy the drug: "If medication is appropriate, your QuickMD clinician can prescribe GLP-1 medications ... Your prescription can be sent to your pharmacy of choice. No insurance is required. Medication costs vary based on the medication prescribed and your pharmacy choice." The pricing card adds "No insurance needed, no membership, and no surprise fees" and, immediately beneath it, "Not available in LA." | September 2026source |
compareglp may earn a commission when a reader signs up with a provider through a link on this site. 4 of the 73 providers reviewed here are paid partners today; the other 69 are not. See how this works.
See QuickMD's current price →Good fit if
- Readers who want a one-off prescribing visit at a flat published fee, with no subscription attached.
- Buyers who already know which pharmacy they want to use and only need someone to write the prescription.
- People who want to see what a clinician can actually prescribe before booking, across three molecules and both formulations.
- Anyone who wants a membership ruled out in writing rather than inferred from silence.
Look elsewhere if
- Anyone comparing what treatment costs. The fee buys a visit and the drug price is never quoted.
- Readers who need their state confirmed. The only footprint statement for this service is four words long and its abbreviation is ambiguous.
- Buyers who want a governing-law clause in the terms they are agreeing to.
- People who want the dispensing pharmacy or an individual prescriber named.
- Anyone who wants every charge on the priced page. Two cancellation fees live only in the terms.
How this review was verified
- Read every page in a browser and took every path from the site's own links, because this host answers a nonexistent path with the homepage at every depth and a second domain silently becomes this one.
- Used the effective URL as the only discriminator between a real page and a missing one. On this host the hash is identical across all three probed depths while the byte sizes differ, so a hash check and a size check contradict each other and neither can be trusted.
- Detected prices two ways and required both: a pattern over the page's whole visible text, and a per-element audit for a real laid-out rectangle. On the pricing page the per-element ruler alone returns nothing at all, because the page renders a currency symbol, a number and a period word as three sibling elements, and this nearly produced a false rejection of a seller that publishes six figures.
- Recorded the consultation fee with a flag saying it is not the medication, so no tool on this site can add it to a drug price or read it as one.
- Recorded both of the seller's own period words for the same charge rather than choosing one.
- Read where the fifty-one state links actually go rather than what the rows say. Every one resolves to a different service line, so that table is not recorded as a footprint for this one.
- Censused the full terms for a governing-law clause and found none; the conditional venue clause is recorded verbatim instead of being resolved to a state.
- Recorded the two cancellation charges from the terms in the membership qualifier, where a reader comparing the headline fee will see them.
- Searched the agency's published warning-letter record for the company name, 2017 to 2026, with a positive and a negative control in the same pass, and found no table. That search covers warning letters only; untitled letters are published separately and were not searched.